
The allegations made against the Prime Minister are extremely serious. I do not intend making political
capital from them, I actually believe the issue is far too serious for that. I would like to see a full and urgent investigation and the results published quickly. I would also like to see the Prime Minister ask HM The Queen for a general election so that we can clear the air and start concentrating on the challenges the government should be concentrating on.
Bullying is abhorrent. I do not like bullies and I believe there is no place for them at any level, whether in school or in the work place. And certainly not at the heart of government. That is why I do not approve of the manner in which the Chief Executive of the charity at the heart of the more recent allegations has been pursued with ruthless determination by Labour spin doctors. Whether she betrayed a confidence in alleging that some employees at Downing Street had called her helpline is a matter for people to take their own view. What I do not think is in question is that when in a corner, the New Labour media management team shows a nasty and sinister side that could be described as bullying.
This whole episode distracts us from the failure of the current government to tackle the social and economic problems of the country, the lack of leadership from Mr Brown and the betrayal of the public over issues such as the Lisbon Treaty and wars in Afghanistan and Iraq. It has brought the office of Prime Minister into disrepute at a time when trust in politicians is already rock bottom, and does nobody in public service any credit.
Along with thousands of other residents, I signed a petition to the Prime Minister in protest at plans to cut
the subsidy to the London boroughs for the Freedom pass - a vital lifeline for residents aged 60+ or disabled, living in London. The government agreed a 3 year funding formula and then decided to tear up the commitment and reduce the grant by £29 million.
The response can be seen here. What it proves is that the government neither cares nor wishes to listen. In short, it says the cut will proceed regardless of public opposition, and that London gets more than its fair share. If only that were true! Strange, I always thought that Londoners subsidise certain other parts of the UK, including those where university courses, hospital car parks, care of the elderly and prescriptions are all free. Silly me.
The Housing Minister who recently visited Eltham in an attempt to spread false accusations about
Conservative housing policy has today revealed his true feelings about the record number of people repoesssed in the last year. In a media interview he said that for some people it "can be the best option".
Tell that to the 46,000 people reposessed in 2009, a 14 year high. I bet they were really grateful to the lenders who took their homes off them.
If you read The Sun newspaper, you may already be aware of an extraordinary new book that has been published to help children understand why their fathers sometimes have to be away from home. Written
by an old school friend of mine, who served in Iraq and wrote the first part of it on the plane home, it helps to answer the inevitable questions any youngster would have when seeing their dad disappear for an extended time. So whether dad is a soldier like Chris, an oil rigger, a sailor, a businessman, a doctor, an actor or a truck driver, hopefully this book can offer some comfort.
My Daddy's Going Away is illustrated with delightful cartoons and has an introductory message from HRH The Prince of Wales. The book tells the story through a poem. All proceeds are going to Combat Stress and the Foundation for Integrated Health, both charities with which the Prince is involved.
If you have children I am sure they would appreciate this book. If you dont have children, why not buy one for these great causes and donate the book to a local charity shop, so that another child might have the benefit. Today, I have bought one for each of my four god children.
You can purchase the book here.
As someone who has lost relatives and friends to cancer let me make absolutely clear my commitment to
putting this and the NHS at the top of the political agenda. I have signed the Cancer Research UK pledge to make cancer an election issue. I want an honest and genuine debate about how we intend to put medical priorities ahead of political priorities, how success can be measured by medical outcomes not boxes ticked, how we canseek to prevent disease and illness and improve people's health.
The Conservative Party has made a commitment to ring fence spending on the NHS even in the deepest recession in living memory.
On Monday, Gordon Brown promised cancer patients their own specialist nurse who would care for them at home, along with a variety of pledges already announced in September last year. Yet just last year he cut the amount the NHS spends on each cancer patient by £650. And the extra money he says he will provide would only represent 30 minutes of a nurse’s time per patient per year. And then only if he remains Prime Minister after the next election, assuming he ever tells us how he would pay for it. Now I see he has launched a negative poster campaign saying the Conservatives would cut cancer service provision. How cynical and nasty.
Leadership is about being brave, principled and taking tough decisions even when such actions may not immediately help your own cause.
Today David Cameron made a speech in East London. He set out how he would start to rebuild trust in
our political system - a challenge that should not be under-estimated. Among the many very welcome commitments was a pledge that any petition with 100,000 signatures will be eligible for a parliamentary debate; and any petition with 1 million+ signatures would lead to a Bill being presented to Parliament.
There will be times when parliamentarians will despair of ever having introduced this power. That is how it should be! MPs are there to represent the public who elect them. And I believe the more they are seen to be 'in touch' with the feeling of the public, the more politics will seem relevant to the public.
These may seem like small measures, but think how little direct influence members of the public have over legislators at the moment. Suddenly, under these proposals, there will be a real purpose to debate among the public - and not only in the run up to elections. In addition to a reduction in the number and cost of MPs and greater transparency over issues like remuneration, and stronger limits on political lobbyists, today's speech proves who has the required leadership qualities in Westminster.
A female constituent emailed me today to say: "How coincidental, both Brown and Campbell cry during TV interviews so close to an election". Clearly, the woman was suggesting there was a calculated attempt to secure sympathy in the hope that Labour might stand a better chance at the election. It is a question being tackled on a number of blogs and will no doubt be a part of the news cycle for the remainder of this week (the interview with Mr Brown is due to air on Saturday).
I watched the interview with Alastair Campbell and didn't buy it for a moment. He is a calculating media relations supremo who is known to stop at nothing to win. He will have known exactly how to play that interview with Andrew Marr and will no doubt have seen the impact Hilary Clinton's tears had in one of her primary elections in the USA.
I have not seen the interview with Mr Brown, but I shall be watching it next weekend. I have no doubt that his very good friend Piers Morgan will have discussed the questions in advance and Mr Brown will have prepared for it. But whatever our differences of opinion on many things, I don't think anyone can ever fully recover from the death of a child. I lost my mother to Breast Cancer nearly 5 years ago and I still find it difficult to accept. I have huge sympathy for the Browns on a personal level. It doesn't make me more inclined to vote for Mr Brown, any more than the loss of David Cameron's son makes him any more popular. But I do think there is a danger that some, like my constituent, will question the timing of this interview.
I had the great pleasure of meeting the Irish Ambassador at his Embassy this week, and was briefed on some of the
significant issues that concern our two countries. Many people living in and around this constituency have direct links with Ireland and it was extremely kind of the Ambassador, Bobby McDonagh and his colleagues, to spare so much of their time. I hope to remain in touch with him and his team in the future and to further strengthen the relationship between our two communities.