
I attended the Community Association of New Eltham AGM last night and was pleased to see it was quite well attended despite being a very cold and dark evening. The Association, born out of a possibility the Library would be closed, now enters its 13th year - yet I am told some people still don't kno
w that C.A.N.E. exists.
For those who have received support from the Community Chest or the
Helping Hand Fund, C.A.N.E. has been able to help dreams come true. They exist for the community and contribute to the
community The coffee shop is a focal point in the community and their events programme is as broad as it is ambitious.
f you know where New Eltham Library is, you know where C.A.N.E. is - drop in and support our local community association. I only wish we had something similar in all our local communities.
Belatedly the BBC has seen fit to respond to public anger over the behaviour of Jonathan Ross and Russell Brand. I am pleased to see Ross has been suspended without pay for 12 weeks - and I hope the salary he is losing will benefit an appropriate charity. I believe both entertainers have suffered suitable punishment and would suggest the debate must now turn to how the BBC polices itself in future, both in terms of how it decides what is fit for broadcast and how it responds to public reaction to those broadcasts.
I look forward to Jonathan Ross returning to the BBC in the new year - and keeping just the right side of good taste as he has usually done in the past.
When Dr Who returned to the BBC I really didn't expect to become such an avid fan, but thanks to David Tennant I am not just a fan, I love it! So I was very sad, but not surprised, to learn this morning that he is retiring from the role and will hand over to someone else for the 2010 series.
I suppose it's too much to hope that Catherine Tate might take over, but whoever does has a massive act to follow. And I look forward to seeing who lands one of the best gigs in TV.
That is how the Ross & Brand story was described by one caller to a television station this morning. I completely disagree.
The behaviour of the two very well paid presenters was completely unacceptable. So was the decision to allow the pre-recorded material to be broadcast. Not because they pushed the boundaries of taste - that is their forte and their fans know to expect that. But because they pushed the boundaries far, far too far. And in doing so attracted the attention of the millions of people who do not regularly tune into these two guys' shows, but still have to fund their programmes and their salaries through the Licence fee.
Brand has now resigned and issued a sincere apology. I think that was the right thing to do and am sure it will not be long before he is back on our screens, though one assumes on a commercial channel. Ross has also issued an apology, but currently retains his massive salary. There has been no word on those who thought this material was fit for broadcast. We assume they have not been suspended and continue to take decisions on radio broadcasting. That is the real scandal.
Jonathan Ross and Russell Brand are very popular entertainers among their core audience and are very well rewarded for what they do. They have both made their reputations on the back of controversial material and, in the case of Brand, via constant appearances in tabloid newspapers. We should not, therefore, be surprised by their latest performance. It is fairly typical of their style - and may well have amused a certain section of their audience. However, I believe they have crossed a line this time and personally I do not buy their limited apologies to Andrew Sachs.
Whether or not they should be sacked is for the BBC to determine - it may actually not be possible to sack them as they may well have been acting within the terms of their contracts for all we know. But purely on a moral basis, I am surprised they have not offered a substantial donation to a charity of Andrew Sachs and his granddaughter's choice.
The programme was pre-recorded, not broadcast live. I wonder, therefore, who edited this show and decided it was still suitable for broadcast. Whoever took that decision should also be brought to account. I suspect that person earns considerably less than either of these two men, but that person should be considering their role in all of this too.
There has been a huge controversy surrounding George Osborne's brief visit to a rich Russian's yacht while on holiday. I have been a little surprised how much media coverage this has attracted - everyone seems to agree he has not done anything illegal. The worst mistake he made seems to be meeting this man in the first place - and enjoying the company of Peter Mandelson in a social setting.
George has now agreed that was a mistake and I for one hope that means we can now all move on. The media should be exposing the real scandal of Gordon brown allowing this country to spend, spend, spend in the good times and to leave us so exposed in the difficult times that this recession will be deeper, longer and more painful than it ever should have been. And now he is borrowing trillions to bail us out - money which my generation and those behind us will have to pay for years to come, long after Mr Brown is a footnote in history.
I am delighted to have been accepted to the Playtex Moonwalk next year, my third time of taking part. The 26.2 miles speedwalk through central London takes place overnight on Saturday 16 May and involves around 15,000 women and a few men. It is a condition of entering the event that all walkers wear a bra externally. As I want to stand out from the crowd, I will be launching a design competition, details to follow.
Anyone wishing to sponsor me can do so through my dedicated on-line form to be found at www.bmycharity.com/V2/DavidGold4Eltham2009. Further details can also be found on Facebook.
I'll try to keep people posted of my training and fundraising. Any support would be appreciated and if you'd like to line the route, you'd be very welcome as long as you bring a flask of hot tea!
We now have it from the mouth of the Home Secretary herself. Some of the most violent crime are recorded as less serious offences. Worse, she dismisses this as though it doesn't matter. It does.
Ministers have long shouted from the rooftops that crime is falling - and many have suggested this does not tally with their own experiences. Now we have proof that figures are, at best, manipulated. And that government ministers see nothing wrong in this. It begs the question, how much violent crime in the Eltham area is downgraded to make the figures look better? And how many more resources might we have been allocated if the true picture had been clear?
We spent a very happy Sunday entertaining a friend from New York, showing him Greenwich Market before heading to East London for a great lunch, and some more sight-seeing prior to attending a film. Sadly, we never made the film. We returned to our car to find we had one less window than when we left it - and our sat-nav gone. Of course we had left it in the glove compartment, but we had removed all evidence which might have tempted a passing thief...except the cradle in which the screen used to sit. That was visible through the window.
This is not the first time I have been a victim of crime, and as my partner and I keep reminding ourselves this is hardly the worst that could have happened to us. However, just the hassle of getting a window replaced, dealing with the Police, the insurer, a ruined evening...we learnt a hard lesson, but I can't help thinking this sort of opportunistic crime is likely to rise in the current economic climate. Time for all of us to be ever more careful.
There's a huge misunderstanding of residents from the Ferrier Estate. Far too often I hear people seeming to blame young people living on the estate for just about every problem within a ten mile radius. Strangely, I always find my visits to the Ferrier hugely enjoyable and inspirational.
I recently met Rosa, a woman who seems to have the energy of six people. Having lived on the estate for a quarter century, raising her children there, she is now planning to open a cafe. I admire her courage. Opening any new enterprise in the current climate is brave, but to do so on an estate which is continuing to die a slow painful death may seem crazy to some. But if you meet Rose you understand she's not motivated by profit - she loves her community, is proud to be a resident of the Ferrier Estate, and wants to provide a great facility for local people. What a refreshing change in an era of bankers being rewarded excessive bonuses for failure. I wish her every success.